MSAdvance case studies

Microsoft 365, Azure and Cybersecurity Case Studies

Enterprise migrations, tenant consolidation, Azure architecture, Zero Trust, Microsoft Defender, Sentinel, Intune, Purview, SharePoint, Teams and Modern Workplace transformation.

This selection presents representative Microsoft engagements delivered by MSAdvance. Public references identify the client where publication has been authorized; other engagements are anonymized to preserve confidentiality commitments and sensitive organizational information.

Technology applied to business requirements

Projects are defined by context, risk and objectives

Microsoft projects require a clear understanding of the current environment, technical dependencies, business requirements and operational constraints. That assessment determines the most appropriate architecture, technology and execution sequence.

Depending on the scenario, the scope may combine migration, identity, security, Microsoft Intune, Defender, Sentinel, Purview, Azure, collaboration or governance. Technology is selected according to the project objective, not the other way around.

The references on this page represent different engagement types and scales, from migrations and tenant consolidation to cybersecurity, Azure and Modern Workplace initiatives.

Areas of expertise

Representative projects across the Microsoft ecosystem

From email and tenant migration to architecture, security, device management, data governance and the operation of Microsoft Cloud environments.

M365

Microsoft 365 Migrations

Tenant-to-tenant, Google Workspace, Exchange, IMAP, OneDrive, Dropbox, SharePoint and Teams.

ID

Identity & Zero Trust

Entra ID, MFA, Conditional Access, PIM, Identity Protection and least privilege.

XDR

Microsoft Defender

Endpoints, identity, email, applications, signal correlation and response.

SIEM

Microsoft Sentinel

SIEM, SOAR, analytics rules, connectors, playbooks and response automation.

AZ

Azure Architecture

Landing zones, networking, PaaS, IaaS, high availability and business continuity.

FIN

Azure FinOps

Cost visibility, rightsizing, reservations, tagging, budgets and financial governance.

UEM

Microsoft Intune

MDM, MAM, Windows Autopilot, compliance, updates and secure BYOD.

DATA

Purview & Data Governance

Sensitivity, DLP, retention, eDiscovery and information protection.

Featured case study

Microsoft 365 consolidation following a merger

Post-merger consolidation project covering email, collaboration, identity, security, domains and coexistence, delivered through a controlled transition strategy.

Microsoft 365 Tenant-to-tenant M&A 24/7 operations

International organization · Published reference case

800 users and approximately 12 TB consolidated into a single Microsoft 365 tenant

Post-merger consolidation project integrating two Microsoft 365 environments into a common corporate platform. The scope covered Exchange Online, OneDrive, SharePoint Online, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Entra ID, applications, permissions and domains, with specific continuity and coordination requirements throughout the transition.

800 users
~12 TB data
3 weeks project execution
≥99.7% technical success
Scope

Consolidation of email, personal storage, collaboration, identity and related services within the corporate target tenant.

Strategy

Structured delivery using a pilot, pre-staging, controlled waves, delta synchronization, temporary coexistence and final domain cutover.

Complexity

Coordinated handling of retention, permissions, SSO applications, OneNote, Teams dependencies, mail rules and service limits.

Project outcome: users, data and services were consolidated into a single Microsoft 365 environment, reducing duplication and simplifying the administration of identity and collaboration.

View the full technical case study
Microsoft 365

Migrations and tenant consolidation

Transition projects where the priority is to preserve consistency across identities, permissions, domains, data and services while executing the technical migration.

Google Workspace Exchange Online Google Drive SharePoint

More than 1,300 users migrated from Google Workspace to Microsoft 365

Migration of more than 1,300 users from Google Workspace to Microsoft 365. The scope included email, calendars, contacts, Google Drive and Shared Drives, together with a prior review of the document and permissions model.

Email & calendars

Migration of Gmail, calendars and contacts to Exchange Online in line with the agreed scope and retention criteria.

Drive & Shared Drives

Assignment of personal content to OneDrive and shared corporate documentation to SharePoint Online.

Permissions

Review and mapping of groups, owners and external access to adapt the sharing model to Microsoft 365.

Outcome

The target environment became operational on Exchange Online, Teams, OneDrive and SharePoint, with the in-scope historical information available on the destination platform.

View Google Workspace to Microsoft 365 migration services
Tenant-to-tenant Consolidation Exchange OneDrive

Consolidation of three Microsoft 365 tenants into a common corporate environment

Consolidation of three Microsoft 365 tenants with independent policies, domains and administration models. The objective was to establish a common corporate environment for identity, collaboration, security and operations.

Identity

Definition of UPN, SMTP, alias, synchronized account, group and Microsoft 365 object mappings before migration.

Collaboration

Progressive transition of OneDrive, SharePoint Online, Microsoft Teams and groups into the target tenant.

Coexistence

Design of temporary coexistence for migrated and pending users, including mail flow and cross-environment communication.

Outcome

The three tenants were consolidated under a single corporate administration, identity, collaboration and security model.

SharePoint Online Microsoft Teams Permissions OneDrive

Integration of more than 180 SharePoint sites

Integration of more than 180 SharePoint sites into a common corporate environment. The preparation phase included analysis of structure, permissions, usage and Microsoft Teams dependencies to rationalize content before the transition.

Inventory

Analysis of libraries, versions, data volume, unique permissions, guests, groups and the relationship between each site and Microsoft Teams.

Rationalization

Identification of unused sites, duplicated structures and permission models requiring simplification.

Execution

Pre-staging of information in batches followed by incremental synchronization before the final migration windows.

Outcome

Content was integrated into the target environment with a more consistent structure prepared for ongoing governance.

Dropbox OneDrive SharePoint Permissions

Approximately 8 TB reorganized within Microsoft 365

Migration of approximately 8 TB from Dropbox to Microsoft 365. The scope included content classification to distinguish personal and corporate information and assign it to OneDrive or SharePoint according to usage.

Destination

Definition of the destination for each information set according to ownership, collaboration requirements and content lifecycle.

Access

Review of members, owners and external links before transferring the required access model to the new environment.

Scale

Execution through pre-migration scans, batch processing, throughput control and incompatible-item tracking.

Outcome

In-scope information was integrated into Microsoft 365 with a clear separation between personal storage and corporate document spaces.

Carve-out Microsoft 365 Entra ID Separation

Separation of business units into new Microsoft 365 tenants

Separation of users, data, identities and Microsoft 365 services across new target entities. The delivery model had to establish operational independence and controlled access after each separation phase.

Segmentation

Classification of users, mailboxes, OneDrive, sites, Teams and groups according to the defined target entity.

Identity

Design of UPNs, SMTP addresses, domains and accounts to avoid collisions and maintain consistency throughout the separation.

Security

Validation of permissions and cross-tenant access before each migration wave was closed.

Outcome

The in-scope business units were separated into their respective Microsoft 365 tenants and prepared to operate independently.

Microsoft Cybersecurity

Identity, devices, threat protection and data security

Projects designed to reduce exposure, strengthen controls and improve detection and response capabilities without compromising day-to-day operations.

Entra ID MFA PIM Zero Trust

Identity and privileged access redesign for more than 500 users

Review and redesign of the identity model for an organization with more than 500 users. The assessment identified standing privileges, partial MFA coverage and inconsistent access criteria.

Identity

Review of administrative accounts, authentication methods, MFA, roles and application dependencies.

Conditional Access

Definition of policies based on risk, user profile, device state and access criticality.

Privileged access

Implementation of controlled activation for sensitive roles using Microsoft Entra PIM.

Outcome

Reduced exposure associated with standing privileges and establishment of a more consistent and governable access model.

Defender XDR Sentinel Intune Entra ID

Improved security visibility across an organization distributed over hundreds of locations

Consolidation of security monitoring for a distributed organization with thousands of users and devices. The scope integrated identity, endpoint, email and cloud-service signals into a common detection and response model.

Defender XDR

Integration of endpoint, identity and email signals to improve context during incident investigation.

Sentinel

Centralization of relevant data sources and definition of use cases and analytics rules aligned with priority risks.

Response

Introduction of automation and documented procedures to standardize repetitive response activities.

Outcome

The security operation gained additional context for incident prioritization and a more consistent monitoring model across locations, users and devices.

Purview DLP Retention Sensitive information

Governance and protection of sensitive information in Microsoft 365

Information governance and protection project in Microsoft 365, including classification controls, data loss prevention and retention.

Classification

Definition of a sensitivity-label model limited to the categories required for practical administration and adoption.

DLP

Initial validation of policies in evaluation and warning modes before applying restrictions to higher-risk scenarios.

Retention

Review of retention, audit and recovery requirements according to the nature and criticality of the information.

Outcome

A Microsoft 365 protection model was established to strengthen control over classification, use and information lifecycle.

ENS Entra ID Azure Microsoft 365

Technical alignment plan for the Spanish National Security Framework (ENS) in Microsoft Cloud

Technical assessment translating Spanish National Security Framework (ENS) requirements into applicable controls across Microsoft 365 and Azure. The engagement covered configuration review, gap identification, remediation prioritization and evidence definition.

Assessment

Review of identities, roles, authentication, logging, endpoint protection and Azure resource configuration.

Gaps

Classification of findings by risk, dependency and remediation effort.

Evidence

Definition of controls that could be verified through configuration, logs and policies.

Outcome

Delivery of a prioritized technical remediation plan designed to support ENS alignment while maintaining operational continuity.

MDO Email security
Defender for Office 365 Anti-phishing

Email security hardening with Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Review and adjustment of Exchange Online and Microsoft Defender for Office 365 configuration to strengthen protection against phishing, impersonation and malicious content.

Project outcome

Email protection policies were standardized and controls around Safe Links, Safe Attachments and email authentication were strengthened.

CSPM Azure Security
Defender for Cloud Azure Policy

Microsoft Azure security posture assessment and improvement

Azure security posture assessment covering resource exposure, privilege, recommendations, risky configurations and policy compliance.

Project outcome

Security findings were prioritized and a continuous monitoring model based on policy and security telemetry was established.

View Microsoft cybersecurity services
Microsoft Azure

Architecture, modernization, security and cost governance

Projects designed to establish an Azure platform that is governable, secure, observable and capable of evolving with business requirements.

Azure Landing Zone Azure Policy Security

Design of a governed Azure foundation and reference architecture

Architecture and governance engagement for an Azure platform that had incorporated workloads and services under different operating criteria. The objective was to establish a common foundation for future deployments.

Governance

Review of management groups, subscriptions, roles, naming conventions, tagging and deployment policies.

Networking

Definition of segmentation, connectivity and service-access criteria.

Security

Incorporation of Azure Policy, Defender for Cloud, managed identities and privilege controls into the reference design.

Outcome

A platform foundation was established with common governance, networking and security criteria for future deployments.

Azure Architecture Optimization

Azure architecture redesign for scalability, performance and predictability

Azure architecture review and redesign focused on improving response to demand variation, reducing manual adjustments and maintaining application stability.

Analysis

Review of resources, dependencies, workload patterns and components affecting scalability.

Design

Architecture changes to make more effective use of Azure elasticity capabilities.

Cost

Joint evaluation of performance and consumption to improve financial predictability.

Outcome

The client reported improved resource adjustment to demand, more predictable costs and better performance.

Azure FinOps Cost Management Rightsizing

Implementation of a FinOps model for Azure cost control and optimization

FinOps engagement designed to restore visibility over Azure consumption and distinguish business-driven growth from spend associated with oversizing, unused resources or inconsistent governance criteria.

Visibility

Cost analysis structured by service, environment, owner and cost center.

Rightsizing

Identification of resources whose utilization did not justify provisioned capacity and evaluation of adjustment options.

Governance

Definition of budgets, alerts, tagging and ownership to identify consumption deviations earlier.

Outcome

Cost management was incorporated into a recurring Azure monitoring and optimization process.

Azure Networking Azure Monitor Continuity

Hybrid architecture integrating on-premises services and Azure workloads

Hybrid architecture project designed to maintain on-premises workloads and Azure services within a common operating model during a phased transition. The scope included connectivity, observability and continuity.

Connectivity

Review of routing, segmentation, name resolution and dependencies between cloud resources and on-premises systems.

Observability

Implementation of Azure Monitor, Log Analytics and alerts to provide operational visibility across the platform.

Continuity

Definition of recovery and failure scenarios for workloads identified as critical.

Outcome

The transition to Azure was structured in phases while workloads requiring temporary local continuity remained on-premises.

View Microsoft Azure services
Modern Workplace

Devices, collaboration and a consistent digital workplace

Projects designed to integrate collaboration, devices, identity and security into a coherent operating model that can be managed and scaled.

Intune Entra ID Compliance Zero Trust

Centralized management of more than 2,100 devices across a distributed organization

Standardization of device management for more than 2,100 devices across multiple locations, using Microsoft Intune as the common platform for configuration, compliance and access control.

Inventory

Review of device profiles, operating system versions, ownership and management status.

Compliance

Definition of compliance criteria covering encryption, version, configuration and security signals.

Deployment

Gradual policy rollout to identify incompatibilities before broader enforcement.

Outcome

A centralized and consistent administration model was established with improved visibility over device fleet status.

Teams SharePoint OneDrive Purview

Collaboration redesign to reduce reliance on shared folders

Microsoft 365 collaboration redesign intended to reduce reliance on traditional shared folders and document distribution by email. The scope focused on information architecture, Microsoft Teams and SharePoint Online.

Information architecture

Definition of collaboration spaces according to ownership, audience, purpose and content lifecycle.

Teams

Structuring of teams and channels according to collaboration requirements and defined responsibilities.

SharePoint

Review of metadata, permissions, versions and navigation to improve document administration and access.

Outcome

A collaboration model was established with less document duplication and clearer ownership and location of information.

INT Devices

Logística Andina

Unified device management with Microsoft Intune

Implementation of Microsoft Intune to centralize configuration, compliance and access policies across a distributed device fleet.

Client-reported outcome

The organization unified device policies and access controls and subsequently reported fewer incidents related to device management.

M365 Collaboration

DataVisión Consultores

Migration and launch of a Microsoft 365 collaboration environment

Migration of email and data together with the introduction of Microsoft Teams and SharePoint Online as the foundation of the new corporate collaboration environment.

Client-reported outcome

Users were able to begin working with Teams and SharePoint from the production launch of the new environment.

AUTO Autopilot

Standardized device provisioning with Windows Autopilot

Design of Microsoft Intune and Windows Autopilot profiles to standardize corporate laptop provisioning and reduce manual preparation tasks.

Project outcome

New-device provisioning was standardized with less dependency on manual intervention by the support team.

AI Copilot

Microsoft 365 Copilot readiness assessment

Pre-adoption assessment focused on permissions, sharing, information sensitivity and Microsoft 365 structure before expanding Microsoft 365 Copilot.

Project outcome

Copilot adoption was approached from a previously reviewed baseline of permissions, sharing and information governance.

View Modern Workplace services

Confidentiality and anonymized references

Certain engagements are subject to confidentiality agreements that limit the information that can be made public. Where authorization exists, we identify the client and the scope that may be published. In other cases, references are limited to sector, scale, technologies and the nature of the work, without including information that could identify the client or expose sensitive details.

This approach allows MSAdvance to document relevant experience while maintaining the confidentiality commitments agreed with each organization.

Experience at a glance

Selection of representative projects and environments

The table summarizes representative MSAdvance engagements and allows direct comparison of scale, technology area, platforms involved and primary objective.

ProjectScaleAreaTechnologiesObjective
Post-merger consolidation800 users · ~12 TBMicrosoft 365Exchange, OneDrive, SharePoint, Teams, Entra IDConsolidate two organizations
Google Workspace to Microsoft 3651,350 users · 7.6 TBMigrationGmail, Drive, Shared Drives, Exchange, SharePointPlatform transition
Three-tenant consolidation2,400+ usersMicrosoft 365Exchange, OneDrive, Teams, SharePoint, Entra IDCommon governance model
Document platform integration1,100+ users · 5.4 TBCollaborationSharePoint, Teams, OneDriveRationalize and consolidate
Dropbox to Microsoft 365200+ users · ~8 TBContent migrationDropbox, OneDrive, SharePointCentralize information
Zero Trust identity redesign550+ usersCybersecurityEntra ID, MFA, Conditional Access, PIMReduce identity risk
Defender XDR & Sentinel2,600+ users · 2,100+ devicesCybersecurityDefender XDR, Sentinel, Intune, Entra IDVisibility and response
Information governance900+ usersCompliancePurview, DLP, Sensitivity Labels, RetentionProtect sensitive information
ENS technical alignment130+ usersCybersecurityMicrosoft 365, Azure, Entra IDTechnical alignment plan
Azure Landing ZoneCorporate environmentAzureAzure Policy, networking, RBAC, Defender for CloudGovernance and scalability
Azure optimizationProduction workloadsAzureCost Management, rightsizing, budgets, taggingFinancial control
Endpoint management2,100+ devicesModern WorkplaceIntune, Entra ID, ComplianceConsistent administration
What we consider a well-delivered project

Success criteria aligned with the objective of each engagement

Validation criteria depend on scope: data integrity for migrations, risk reduction for security, architecture and sustainability for Azure, and operability and adoption for Modern Workplace.

DATA

Integrity

We verify the data, configurations and relevant exceptions included in scope.

SEC

Risk

Security findings and configuration issues are prioritized according to material impact rather than alert volume.

ID

Identity

Roles, authentication and access should align with the target operating model.

OPS

Operations

The resulting solution must remain supportable after the project closes.

COST

Cost

For Azure and licensing, financial sustainability is part of the technical design.

USER

User experience

Security and governance must coexist with the way users need to work.

DOC

Documentation

Key decisions, configurations and exceptions should remain understandable after handover.

VAL

Validation

Closure is based on agreed technical and functional checks, not solely on the status reported by migration or management tools.

01 · Assessment

Understand

Inventory, configuration, risks and dependencies.

02 · Design

Design

Architecture, scope, priorities and validation criteria.

03 · Pilot

Validate

Controlled pilot before wider deployment.

04 · Deployment

Implement

Phased execution with technical tracking.

05 · Validation

Confirm

Results, documentation and agreed next steps.

Frequently asked questions

About MSAdvance projects

Does MSAdvance only deliver migration projects?

No. Migrations are one area of specialization, but MSAdvance also delivers Microsoft Azure architecture, cybersecurity, Microsoft Entra ID, Defender XDR, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Purview, Intune, Modern Workplace, SharePoint, Teams, cloud governance and optimization projects.

What Microsoft cybersecurity projects can MSAdvance deliver?

Engagements may cover identity and access with Entra ID, MFA, Conditional Access and PIM; endpoint, email, identity and application protection with Microsoft Defender; SIEM and automation with Microsoft Sentinel; information protection and governance with Microsoft Purview; device security with Intune; and Azure security posture with Defender for Cloud and Azure Policy.

Does MSAdvance deliver Microsoft Azure projects?

Yes. We work on Azure architecture, landing zones, networking, hybrid connectivity, PaaS and IaaS services, security, Azure Policy, Defender for Cloud, observability, business continuity, automation and cost optimization.

Can MSAdvance assess an Azure environment that is already in production?

Yes. The engagement does not need to start from a new environment. We can assess an existing Azure platform to identify architecture, security, permission, availability, monitoring, performance and cost issues and prepare a prioritized improvement plan.

Does MSAdvance deliver Microsoft Sentinel projects?

Yes. The scope can include architecture, data connectors, analytics rules, use cases, UEBA, Logic Apps playbooks, response automation, dashboards and data-ingestion optimization.

Can MSAdvance deploy Microsoft Intune in a large organization?

Yes. Projects may include Windows, iOS, iPadOS and Android, configuration profiles, compliance, MDM, MAM, BYOD, Windows Autopilot, Update Rings, Conditional Access integration and Microsoft Defender protection.

Does MSAdvance work with ISO 27001, GDPR or the Spanish National Security Framework (ENS)?

Yes. We can translate compliance requirements into technical controls across Microsoft 365 and Azure, identify gaps, prioritize remediation and support the production of technical evidence. The exact scope depends on the framework and the responsibilities assigned to each party.

Can MSAdvance work with organizations of more than 1,000 users?

Yes. We work with organizations of different sizes, including environments with more than 1,000 and 2,000 users. Larger projects are typically structured through phases, pilots, migration waves and validation criteria to reduce the risk of large-scale change.

Why are some MSAdvance case studies anonymized?

Certain engagements are subject to confidentiality agreements. In those cases we publish the sector, scale and technologies required to explain the nature of the work, without disclosing information that could identify the client or reveal sensitive infrastructure details.

How can we determine whether MSAdvance has delivered a similar project?

Share the approximate number of users, current platforms, Azure environment, devices, Microsoft 365 workloads, security requirements and the objective you need to address. We can then identify comparable scenarios and determine the information required to define the scope.

Discuss your project

Share the context of your project and we will review the appropriate approach.

Tell us about the current environment, the requirement you need to address, the approximate scope and target date. Our team will review the information to identify dependencies, risks and the next steps required to define a technical scope.